ITC0654 - Petite Naine

 

ITC0654(subgr. Cavendish)
(Note: this image has been reduced to fit this window's size; use the mouse wheel on it to zoom in/out.)
Passport Data
PDCIm Score: 6.05
Available for distribution:
Accession number: ITC0654
Accession name: Petite Naine
DOI: 10.18730/9KC5=
Biological status of accession: traditional cultivar or landrace
Taxonomic classification:
Musaceae
Musa
Eumusa
AAA
subgr. Cavendish
Institute code: BEL084 (ITC)
Acquisition date: 1989-12-11
Status: active
Type of storage:
In Vitro Collection
Cryopreserved Collection
Lyophilized Leaves
Morphological Characterization Pictures
Morphological Characterization Data
Not available
Phenotyping

Experiment: 1

Institute: IITA
Date of planting: 2015/08/22
Date of data collection: 2015/09/30
Observable Attribute Value
cigar leaf Pigmentation of outer surface of cigar leaf on sucker green
fruit Fruit apex point rounded
fruit Fruit shape of curve straight (or slightly curved)
fruit Remains of flower relicts at fruit apex persistent style
fruit Number of fruits on mid-hand of the bunch 13-16
fruit Fruit length less than or equal to 15 cm
fruit pedicel 6.7.11 - Fusion of pedicels no visible sign of fusion
fruit pedicel Fruit pedicel length 11-20 mm
inflorescence bud Male bud length 0
infructescence Bunch shape cylindrical
infructescence Bunch position hanging vertically
infructescence Number of hands measured 10
infructescence axis Male rachis position falling vertically
infructescence axis Male rachis appearance neutral/male flowers and presence of withered bracts on the entire stalk
petiole canal Margin behaviour on petiole canal of third leaf open with margins spreading
petiole margin Petiole margin colour green
petiole margin Petiole margins winged winged and not clasping the pseudostem
petiole margin Colour line along edge of petiole margin contrast between margin and petiole (with a contrasting colour line along)
petiole proximal end Blotches relative area at petiole base large blotches
plant sap 6.2.7 - Sap colour whitish
pseudostem Pseudostem height less than or equal to 2 m
pseudostem Main underlying colour of pseudostem light green

Experiment: 2

Institute: IITA
Date of planting: 2015/08/22
Date of data collection: 2015/09/30
Observable Attribute Value
cigar leaf Pigmentation of outer surface of cigar leaf on sucker green
fruit Fruit apex point rounded
fruit Fruit shape of curve straight (or slightly curved)
fruit Remains of flower relicts at fruit apex persistent style
fruit Fruit length less than or equal to 15 cm
fruit Number of fruits on mid-hand of the bunch 13-16
fruit pedicel 6.7.11 - Fusion of pedicels no visible sign of fusion
fruit pedicel Fruit pedicel length 11-20 mm
inflorescence bud Male bud length 0
infructescence Bunch shape cylindrical
infructescence Bunch position hanging vertically
infructescence Number of hands measured 9
infructescence axis Male rachis position falling vertically
infructescence axis Male rachis appearance neutral/male flowers and presence of withered bracts on the entire stalk
petiole canal Margin behaviour on petiole canal of third leaf open with margins spreading
petiole margin Petiole margin colour green
petiole margin Petiole margins winged winged and not clasping the pseudostem
petiole margin Colour line along edge of petiole margin contrast between margin and petiole (with a contrasting colour line along)
petiole proximal end Blotches relative area at petiole base large blotches
plant sap 6.2.7 - Sap colour whitish
pseudostem Pseudostem height less than or equal to 2 m
pseudostem Main underlying colour of pseudostem light green

Experiment: 3

Institute: IITA
Date of planting: 2015/08/22
Date of data collection: 2015/09/30
Observable Attribute Value
cigar leaf Pigmentation of outer surface of cigar leaf on sucker green
fruit Fruit apex point rounded
fruit Fruit shape of curve straight (or slightly curved)
fruit Remains of flower relicts at fruit apex persistent style
fruit Fruit length 16-20 cm
fruit Number of fruits on mid-hand of the bunch equal to or more than 17
fruit pedicel 6.7.11 - Fusion of pedicels no visible sign of fusion
fruit pedicel Fruit pedicel length 11-20 mm
inflorescence bud Male bud length 0
infructescence Bunch shape cylindrical
infructescence Bunch position hanging vertically
infructescence Number of hands measured 9
infructescence axis Male rachis position falling vertically
infructescence axis Male rachis appearance neutral/male flowers and presence of withered bracts on the entire stalk
petiole canal Margin behaviour on petiole canal of third leaf open with margins spreading
petiole margin Petiole margin colour green
petiole margin Petiole margins winged winged and not clasping the pseudostem
petiole margin Colour line along edge of petiole margin contrast between margin and petiole (with a contrasting colour line along)
petiole proximal end Blotches relative area at petiole base large blotches
plant sap 6.2.7 - Sap colour whitish
pseudostem Pseudostem height less than or equal to 2 m
pseudostem Main underlying colour of pseudostem light green

Experiment: 4

Institute: IITA
Date of planting: n/a
Date of data collection: 2016/05/11
Observable Attribute Value
anther Anther colour white
bract Colour of bract external face purple-brown
bract Bract behaviour before falling not revolute (not rolling)
bract Colour of bract internal face orange red
bract apex Bract imbrication at apex of male bud convolute
bract apex Bract apex shape slightly pointed
cigar leaf Pigmentation of outer surface of cigar leaf on sucker green
flower 6.6.24 - Dominant colour of male flower white
fruit Fruit apex point rounded
fruit Fruit shape of curve straight (or slightly curved)
fruit Fruit length 16-20 cm
fruit Number of fruits on mid-hand of the bunch equal to or more than 17
fruit Remains of flower relicts at fruit apex persistent style
fruit pedicel Fruit pedicel length 11-20 mm
fruit pedicel 6.7.11 - Fusion of pedicels no visible sign of fusion
inflorescence bud Male bud shape like a top
inflorescence bud Male bud length 14-11
infructescence Bunch shape cylindrical
infructescence Bunch position hanging vertically
infructescence Number of hands measured 11
infructescence axis Male rachis position falling vertically
infructescence axis Male rachis appearance neutral/male flowers and presence of withered bracts on the entire stalk
petiole canal Margin behaviour on petiole canal of third leaf open with margins spreading
petiole margin Petiole margin colour green
petiole margin Petiole margins winged winged and not clasping the pseudostem
petiole margin Colour line along edge of petiole margin contrast between margin and petiole (with a contrasting colour line along)
petiole proximal end Blotches relative area at petiole base large blotches
plant sap 6.2.7 - Sap colour whitish
pseudostem Pseudostem height less than or equal to 2 m
pseudostem Main underlying colour of pseudostem light green
tepal Compound tepal main colour white
tepal Lobe colour of tip of compound tepal yellow
Breeding
Collecting/acquisition source
Type Name Donor Code Donor Institute Country
1. Collection CIRAD CIRAD II.04.30.002.012; (LCIV PN) Donor Institute Country: France
2. Collection VITROPIC Donor Institute Country: France
Collecting Location
Not available
Genetic Integrity
Ploidy: 3x   (Musa Genotyping Centre (MGC), Institute of Experimental Botany (IEB), Olomouc, Czeck Republic, 25/01/2001)
Field verified: yes
FV conclusion: validated as True To Type (TTT)
Molecular Characterisation
DArT whole genome profiling of ITC accessions
Taxonomic Reference Collection (TRC)
Musa Genotyping Center Results (triploids)
Publications
  • Drapal M, Amah D, Schöny H, Brown A, Swennen R, Fraser PD.  2020.  Assessment of metabolic variability and diversity present in leaf, peel and pulp tissue of diploid and triploid Musa spp.. Phytochemistry. 176:112388.
    •
  • Drapal M, de Carvalho EBarros, Rouard M, Amah D, Sardos J, Van den Houwe I, Brown A, Roux N, Swennen R, Fraser PD.  2019.  Metabolite profiling characterises chemotypes of Musa diploids and triploids at juvenile and pre-flowering growth stages. Scientific reports. 9:4657.
    •
  • Nakato GV, Christelová P, Were E, Nyine M, Coutinho TA, Doleżel J, Uwimana B, Swennen R, Mahuku G.  2019.  Sources of resistance in Musa to Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum, the causal agent of banana xanthomonas wilt. Plant Pathology. 68:49–59.Musalit
    •
  • Rego ECristina S, Pinheiro TDavid Mira, Antonino JDijair, Alves GSergio Cos, Cotta MGuitton, Fonseca FCampos De, Miller RNeil Gerar.  2019.  Stable reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis of gene expression in the Musa acuminata-Pseudocercospora musae interaction. Scientific reports. 9:1–11.
    •
  • Sardos J., Perrier X., Doležel J., Hřibová E., Christelová P., Van den Houwe I., Kilian A., Roux N..  2016.  DArT whole genome profiling provides insights on the evolution and taxonomy of edible Banana (Musa spp.). Annals of Botany. 118(7):mcw170.
    •
  • Valdez-Ojeda R, James-Kay A, Ku-Cauich JRoberto, Escobedo-GraciaMedrano RMaría.  2014.  Genetic relationships among a collection of Musa germplasm by fluorescent-labeled SRAP. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 10:465–476.
    •
  • Passos MAN, de Cruz VOliveira, Emediato FL, de Teixeira CCamargo, Azevedo VCRennó, Brasileiro ACM, Amorim EP, Ferreira CF, Martins NF, Togawa RC et al..  2013.  Analysis of the leaf transcriptome of Musa acuminata during interaction with Mycosphaerella musicola: gene assembly, annotation and marker development. BMC genomics. 14:1.
    •
  • Volkaert H.  2011.  Molecular Analysis Reveals Multiple Domestications of Edible Bananas. V International Symposium on Banana: ISHS-ProMusa Symposium on Global Perspectives on Asian Challenges 897. Musalit
    •
  • De Langhe E, Hřibová E, Carpentier S, Doleżel J, Swennen R.  2010.  Did backcrossing contribute to the origin of hybrid edible bananas? Annals of botany. 106:849–857.
    •
  • Till BJ, Jankowicz-Cieslak J, Sági L, Huynh OA, Utsushi H, Swennen R, Terauchi R, Mba C.  2010.  Discovery of nucleotide polymorphisms in the Musa gene pool by Ecotilling.. Theor Appl Genet. 121(7):1381-9.
    •
  • Risterucci A-M, Hippolyte I, Perrier X, Xia L, Caig V, Evers M, Huttner E, Kilian A, Glaszmann J-C.  2009.  Development and assessment of Diversity Arrays Technology for high-throughput DNA analyses in Musa.. Theor Appl Genet. 119(6):1093-103.
    •
  • Boonruangrod R, Desai D, Fluch S, Berenyi M, Burg K.  2008.  Identification of cytoplasmic ancestor gene-pools of Musa acuminata Colla and Musa balbisiana Colla and their hybrids by chloroplast and mitochondrial haplotyping. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 118:43–55.
    •